The microblogging landscape has witnessed the emergence of Threads, the latest platform introduced by Meta, helmed by Mark Zuckerberg. While Threads has gained significant popularity, boasting over 100 million sign-ups in a short span, it falls short in several key areas when compared to its primary competitor, Twitter. In this blog post, we will explore ten notable features exclusive to Twitter that are currently absent from Threads, shedding light on the distinctions between these microblogging platforms.
Absence of hashtags:
Threads lacks the prominent feature of hashtags, which play a pivotal role in making topics trend on Twitter. However, given Meta’s experience with hashtags on platforms like Instagram and Facebook, it is likely that Threads will incorporate this feature in the future.
No web version:
Unlike Twitter, which is accessible through web browsers, Threads is currently limited to the mobile app. The absence of a web version may restrict user accessibility and convenience.
Inability to edit posts:
Threads currently lacks the functionality to edit posts, unlike Twitter, which introduced this feature for premium users. Users on Threads must either delete a post or create a new one to make changes.
Lack of direct messaging (DM) option:
Threads does not currently support direct messaging on its platform, limiting user-to-user interactions. The recent implementation of end-to-end encryption further inhibits private conversations.
AI-generated alt text:
Threads uses computer-generated alternative text, posing challenges for users relying on screen readers. Customizable alt text, available on other Meta platforms, may be introduced in Threads to enhance accessibility.
No trending topics:
Threads does not feature a dedicated section for trending topics, unlike Twitter, which uses this function to highlight ongoing news and discussions. Threads focuses more on personal content rather than hard news.
Absence of advertisements:
Unlike Twitter, which displays numerous advertisements, Threads currently operates without ads. The inclusion of ads may be considered in the future, contingent upon the platform’s user base.
Inability to embed Threads posts:
Threads users currently cannot embed posts on external platforms like blogs, unlike Twitter, which offers embedded post links. This limits the reach and sharing potential of Threads content.
Lack of a following feed:
Threads offers a single feed that includes both trending posts and those from followers, without the option to exclusively view posts from followed accounts. Twitter, on the other hand, offers separate “For You” and “Following” feeds.
Absence of a chronological feed:
Threads generates a feed in a random order, unlike Twitter, which allows users to enable a chronological feed. The lack of a chronological organization option may impact user experience and content discovery.
Conclusion:
While Threads has gained considerable traction as a microblogging platform, it falls short in several aspects when compared to Twitter. The absence of hashtags, a web version, editing capabilities, direct messaging, customizable alt text, trending topics, advertisements, embeddable posts, a dedicated following feed, and a chronological feed are notable distinctions between the two platforms. As Threads continues to evolve, it may incorporate some of these features to enhance user experience and compete more effectively with its rivals in the microblogging sphere.
Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to Knowlab using the below form.
